High-A: Pitching Leaders: xFIP

Triple-A	Triple-A West	Triple-A East
Double-A	Double-A Central	Double-A Northeast	Double-A South
High-A	High-A West	High-A Central	High-A East
Low-A	Low-A West	Low-A Southeast	Low-A East

Batting	Pitching

Rank	Pitcher	Age	Team	Org	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	BABIP	HR/FB	GB%	Swing%	Contact%	F-Strike%	SwStr%	CStr%	CSW%
1	Avery Weems	26.8	Hickory	TEX	20	19	85.3	5.70	4.28	2.69	13.1	2.8	1.7	.328	41.0%	48%	49.8%	65.1%	60.4%	17.4%	15.9%	33.3%
2	Benjamin Gross	27.5	Cedar Rapids	MIN	17	16	82.0	4.61	3.31	2.76	11.6	2.5	1.0	.333	13.4%	40%	50.7%	67.2%	62.0%	16.6%	16.2%	32.8%
3	Hunter Gaddis	26.0	Lake County	CLE	18	17	85.3	6.33	4.82	3.06	12.3	2.5	1.9	.305	26.1%	33%	49.3%	65.5%	58.0%	17.0%	16.2%	33.2%
4	Garrett Stallings	26.7	Aberdeen	BAL	17	16	80.0	4.84	4.37	3.11	8.3	1.4	1.5	.318	36.1%	58%	50.9%	70.5%	61.9%	15.0%	16.0%	31.0%
5	Jason Groome	25.6	Greenville	BOS	18	18	81.7	5.73	4.17	3.12	11.9	3.5	1.3	.335	21.8%	48%	48.5%	67.9%	62.4%	15.6%	16.0%	31.6%
6	Connor Lunn	25.8	Peoria	STL	24	23	120.7	4.48	3.52	3.14	9.0	1.5	0.9	.315	13.3%	45%	52.5%	73.7%	61.9%	13.8%	16.9%	30.7%
7	Josh Maciejewski	28.7	Hudson Valley	NYY	18	13	83.3	4.54	4.33	3.18	10.2	2.6	1.4	.271	22.4%	45%	50.7%	66.4%	60.8%	17.0%	15.3%	32.4%
8	Anthony Veneziano	26.6	Quad Cities	KC	23	23	97.7	4.24	3.84	3.20	12.1	3.5	1.0	.316	16.7%	42%	51.2%	63.7%	57.4%	18.6%	13.5%	32.1%
9	Antonio Velez	27.0	Beloit	MIA	20	11	81.0	3.56	3.82	3.21	8.3	1.0	1.1	.240	12.8%	41%	52.6%	72.4%	66.6%	14.5%	18.3%	32.8%
10	Eduardo Salazar	25.9	Dayton	CIN	19	19	98.3	3.84	3.27	3.36	9.8	2.9	0.5	.298	8.3%	47%	45.3%	73.6%	56.7%	11.9%	19.1%	31.1%
11	Colin Peluse	25.8	Lansing	OAK	18	15	86.7	4.26	3.76	3.37	9.6	2.3	1.0	.319	12.3%	36%	50.5%	72.7%	66.3%	13.8%	17.5%	31.3%
11	Mitch Spence	25.9	Hudson Valley	NYY	23	20	105.0	4.37	3.81	3.37	10.1	3.2	0.9	.330	19.2%	54%	47.6%	67.9%	61.0%	15.3%	18.3%	33.6%
13	Justin Slaten	26.6	Hickory	TEX	20	19	82.7	6.64	4.87	3.39	12.0	3.4	1.9	.376	23.6%	34%	48.5%	68.2%	54.5%	15.4%	13.9%	29.3%
14	Kai-Wei Teng	25.4	Eugene	SF	21	21	95.7	4.70	4.18	3.42	13.4	5.1	1.0	.330	20.0%	48%	40.3%	60.8%	56.0%	15.8%	19.1%	34.9%
15	Nathan Ocker	27.4	Lake County	CLE	34	2	80.7	3.01	3.91	3.43	10.5	2.8	1.1	.287	11.4%	28%	45.9%	73.6%	62.3%	12.1%	20.6%	32.7%
16	Alec Kisena	28.5	Brooklyn	NYM	18	16	79.7	5.08	3.80	3.45	11.5	3.8	0.9	.344	14.8%	38%	45.4%	71.5%	52.8%	12.9%	16.7%	29.6%
17	Victor Castaneda	25.6	Wisconsin	MIL	20	20	97.0	5.20	4.89	3.46	10.6	3.4	1.7	.298	20.7%	35%	46.1%	66.8%	57.9%	15.3%	16.6%	32.0%
18	Zack Trageton	25.6	Bowling Green	TB	28	12	88.3	4.89	4.15	3.53	8.6	2.2	1.1	.306	13.9%	45%	47.9%	77.8%	60.9%	10.7%	19.2%	29.8%
18	Anthony Block	26.0	Quad Cities	KC	20	17	90.0	4.00	3.72	3.53	10.1	3.4	0.7	.293	11.5%	52%	45.7%	67.1%	56.7%	15.0%	17.4%	32.4%
20	Brendan White	25.4	West Michigan	DET	26	18	101.7	4.78	3.84	3.54	9.5	2.4	0.8	.328	17.3%	53%	49.3%	75.6%	60.0%	12.0%	16.7%	28.7%
21	Charles Priester	23.6	Greensboro	PIT	19	19	92.7	3.69	3.74	3.56	9.1	3.5	0.7	.286	14.6%	54%	45.4%	67.7%	54.7%	14.7%	15.2%	29.8%
22	Christopher McMahon	25.2	Spokane	COL	23	21	120.7	4.25	3.84	3.60	9.4	2.5	1.0	.336	12.0%	38%	51.8%	74.0%	64.5%	13.5%	15.7%	29.1%
22	Carson Spiers	26.4	Dayton	CIN	20	16	88.7	3.96	3.72	3.60	10.5	2.9	0.8	.293	10.7%	37%	47.9%	67.9%	61.9%	15.4%	17.0%	32.4%
22	Yusniel Padron-Artilles	26.4	Greenville	BOS	25	13	90.3	5.78	5.22	3.60	10.4	2.6	2.0	.332	21.5%	28%	50.9%	72.4%	63.7%	14.1%	16.1%	30.2%
25	Cornelius Van Eyk	25.6	Vancouver	TOR	19	19	80.3	6.39	4.16	3.65	11.2	4.4	1.0	.318	15.0%	43%	44.5%	70.5%	59.4%	13.1%	19.1%	32.2%
26	Chase Shugart	27.5	Greenville	BOS	22	22	105.3	4.96	4.16	3.66	7.9	2.1	1.0	.351	16.7%	50%	50.0%	78.0%	60.3%	11.0%	17.1%	28.0%
27	Jesus Vargas	25.6	Great Lakes	LAD	24	14	103.0	5.07	4.76	3.67	7.7	1.2	1.6	.287	17.5%	40%	51.2%	76.9%	61.4%	11.8%	16.9%	28.7%
27	Wilfredo Pereira	25.0	Peoria	STL	29	13	98.3	4.12	3.87	3.67	10.7	3.8	0.9	.285	11.1%	29%	47.8%	66.7%	52.7%	15.9%	14.3%	30.2%
29	Bryan Hoeing	27.5	Beloit	MIA	22	22	121.0	5.28	4.14	3.71	7.1	1.8	1.0	.310	16.5%	55%	48.7%	76.9%	64.4%	11.3%	16.7%	28.0%
30	Paxton Schultz	26.3	Vancouver	TOR	22	21	102.7	5.96	4.19	3.73	10.0	3.9	1.0	.363	17.5%	47%	47.0%	69.0%	56.1%	14.6%	14.1%	28.7%